Is Havana Syndrome a Microwave Weapon?
by Bradley Hope
/
For seventy years, American diplomats have fallen sick in patterns that trace back to invisible energy fields. Each time, Washington chose the same response: deny, deflect, and bury the evidence. From Moscow to Havana, the government knew more than it ever told its own people.
At Whale Hunting, we don’t stop when the media buzz dies down. We keep digging.
For more than seventy years, a question has haunted the United States: why do its own diplomats keep falling sick in patterns that trace back to invisible energy fields, and why does Washington keep pretending not to notice?
From the Moscow Signal in the 1950s to the embassy attacks in Cuba and China, the evidence reveals not just a weapon, but a pattern of concealment. Each time Americans were struck, the government’s reflex was the same: deny, deflect, and discredit. Behind closed doors, it collected medical data, classified the results, and left its own people to wonder whether the damage in their brains was all in their heads.
This is not a story about just Havana Syndrome. It’s about bureaucracy, betrayal, and a government that habitually chooses silence over truth.
-- Clara
Get the full story—free with your email.
This story is open to all, and our work is available for free to anyone who signs up with their e-mail. But investigations like this aren’t cheap. If you believe accountability journalism matters, consider upgrading to a paid subscription – or sending a one-time boost. Every contribution directly funds more reporting like this.
Have a tip? Reach us at:
📩 whalehunting@projectbrazen.com
📧 projectbrazen@protonmail.com
🔒 Secure contact details here.
We protect our sources.
Quick recap: In our first edition, we examined whether a directed-energy weapon could explain Havana Syndrome — looking at pulsed microwaves and the Frey effect behind the reported sounds and neurological symptoms. The physics make it plausible, but the engineering hurdles are huge, and no such device has ever been found.
➡️ Read the first edition of our Havana Syndrome investigation here.
In our second edition, we focused on the medical evidence — using the case of Mark Lenzi and his family in Guangzhou to show the neurological damage: MRI scans with measurable brain changes, “immaculate concussions” without impact, and symptoms that couldn’t be faked. We also revealed how the U.S. government downplayed the findings, from using faulty detectors to sending psychiatrists instead of physicians.
➡️ Continue with the second edition of our Havana Syndrome investigation here.
In the third edition, we confronted the central question: who could actually carry out these attacks? After eliminating non-state actors and most world powers, only two nations have the decades of research, technical capability, and global tradecraft required: Russia and China. And based on history, motive, and documented precedent, Russia stands as the most likely perpetrator.
➡️ Continue with the third edition of our Havana Syndrome investigation here.
Related Posts